Mark Nottingham
2005-10-10 00:58:07 UTC
I'm curious -- what are RSS1 people's reactions to using Atom
elements in RSS feeds?
I ask because I'm designing an extension that can be used (currently)
in both Atom and RSS feeds -- Feed History <http://www.ietf.org/
internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-04.txt>. It
defines three elements, one of which is in the form:
<fh:prev>http://www.example.com/foo/1</fh:prev>
Some Atom WG members argue that this should be:
<atom:link rel="prev" href="http://www.example.com/foo/1</fh:prev>
and point out that other specs already use Atom elements in RSS feeds.
It's obviously not ideal (you'd need to declare two namespaces to use
the extension in RSS -- one for atom, one for the other elements),
but I'd prefer, if at all possible, to avoid having one element for
RSS feeds and a different one for Atom feeds.
What are people's reactions to this? What's the lesser of two evils
-- using Atom elements in RSS, or having separate elements for
different formats?
Cheers,
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
rss-dev-unsubscribe-***@public.gmane.org
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
elements in RSS feeds?
I ask because I'm designing an extension that can be used (currently)
in both Atom and RSS feeds -- Feed History <http://www.ietf.org/
internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-atompub-feed-history-04.txt>. It
defines three elements, one of which is in the form:
<fh:prev>http://www.example.com/foo/1</fh:prev>
Some Atom WG members argue that this should be:
<atom:link rel="prev" href="http://www.example.com/foo/1</fh:prev>
and point out that other specs already use Atom elements in RSS feeds.
It's obviously not ideal (you'd need to declare two namespaces to use
the extension in RSS -- one for atom, one for the other elements),
but I'd prefer, if at all possible, to avoid having one element for
RSS feeds and a different one for Atom feeds.
What are people's reactions to this? What's the lesser of two evils
-- using Atom elements in RSS, or having separate elements for
different formats?
Cheers,
--
Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
rss-dev-unsubscribe-***@public.gmane.org
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/