Phil Ringnalda
2005-11-16 04:38:59 UTC
Crossing over from the feedvalidator.org mailing list [1], any opinions
on the legality of having <items> include URIs that don't match any
<item>? Since the spec explicitly says that <item>s which doesn't show
up in <items> "are likely to be discarded by RDF parsers" that pretty
clearly should be a warning (but not an error), but is the reverse case
an error, cause for a warning, or perfectly legal?
Phil Ringnalda
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8979986&forum_id=37467
(though the original example gets eaten in Sourceforge's web view)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
rss-dev-unsubscribe-***@public.gmane.org
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
on the legality of having <items> include URIs that don't match any
<item>? Since the spec explicitly says that <item>s which doesn't show
up in <items> "are likely to be discarded by RDF parsers" that pretty
clearly should be a warning (but not an error), but is the reverse case
an error, cause for a warning, or perfectly legal?
Phil Ringnalda
[1]
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=8979986&forum_id=37467
(though the original example gets eaten in Sourceforge's web view)
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
rss-dev-unsubscribe-***@public.gmane.org
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/